The options market provides a real-time gauge of expectations on volatility, and the implied move heading into the print suggests a 6.5-7.5% move for NVDA over the course of this week.
Over the past year, NVIDIA’s earnings story became a guidance credibility test: the company consistently topped consensus on both revenue and adjusted EPS, yet shares traded flat or down after three of the last four prints when forward commentary failed to exceed a bullish Street or when China export restrictions and gross margin sustainability questions crept into the outlook.
The May 2025 report introduced an explicit $8 billion China policy headwind into models; the August print saw shares fall 3.2% after hours despite a clean beat, as investors fretted over data-center growth normalization; even February’s blowout ($68.1 billion revenue versus $66.2 billion expected) left the stock flat because the market had already priced in something close to the result.
Consensus expectations for the April quarter reflect that recalibrated bar. Street estimates of $79.17 billion revenue sit just 1% above NVIDIA’s prior midpoint, while the $1.78 EPS figure implies analysts are modelling for roughly 75% non-GAAP gross margins, in line with management’s ±50 basis points guidance range but offering little cushion if mix shifts or supply-chain costs surprise.
Markets will be watching not just the April-quarter print, but the July-quarter revenue guide, gross margin commentary, Blackwell supply cadence, and any updates on China export assumptions.
Top Australian Brokers
- Pepperstone - Top Australian broker - Read our review
- eToro - Invest in ASX and international shares - Read our review
Consensus Estimates
| Metric | Consensus Estimate | Prior Guide (Midpoint) | Implied Beat Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ~$79.17B | $78.0B (±2%) | ~1.0% |
| Adjusted EPS | ~$1.78 | Implied ~$1.74–$1.78 range | Modest |
| Non-GAAP Gross Margin | ~75.0% | ~75.0% (±50 bps) | In-line |
The gross margin assumption of roughly 75% is perhaps the most critical estimate to watch. Over the past year, NVIDIA’s ability to maintain or expand gross margins even as it scaled production and navigated supply-chain complexities became a key proof-point for the sustainability of its growth. In August 2025, management guided to approximately 73.5% non-GAAP gross margin for the October quarter; by November, that figure had held and the guide for January was raised to around 75%; in February, the company reiterated the 75% level for the April quarter.
Any downside to this figure would likely matter more to the stock than a modest revenue beat, because it would signal that the “quality” of growth is deteriorating. On the other hand, if NVIDIA can deliver gross margins at or above 75.5% (the high end of the guided range), it would reinforce the narrative that the company retains pricing power and operational efficiency even at unprecedented scale.
Track Record: Four Straight Beats, But Increasingly Muted Reactions
NVIDIA has beaten adjusted EPS estimates in each of the last four reported quarters, a streak that on paper looks flawless but in practice reveals a market that has steadily raised the bar for what constitutes a “good” earnings report. The pattern is consistent: the company tops consensus on both revenue and adjusted EPS, often by meaningful margins, yet the stock reaction has ranged from modestly positive to flat to outright negative depending on whether forward guidance and qualitative commentary met an already-elevated set of expectations around Blackwell supply, China assumptions, and gross margin sustainability.
| Quarter (Report Date) | Adj EPS Est. | Adj EPS Act. | Beat/Miss | Rev Est. | Rev Act. | Beat/Miss | Stock Reaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQ1 FY2026 (May 28, 2025) | $0.93 | $0.96 | Beat +3.2% | $43.3B | $44.1B | Beat +1.8% | +5% (extended) |
| FQ2 FY2026 (Aug 27, 2025) | $1.01 | $1.05 | Beat +4.0% | $46.1B | $46.7B | Beat +1.3% | -3.2% (after-hours) |
| FQ3 FY2026 (Nov 19, 2025) | $1.25 | $1.30 | Beat +4.0% | $54.9B | $57.0B | Beat +3.8% | +4.4% (after-market) |
| FQ4 FY2026 (Feb 25, 2026) | $1.53 | $1.62 | Beat +5.9% | $66.2B | $68.1B | Beat +2.9% | Flat (after-hours) |
The takeaway from this four-quarter sequence is clear: NVIDIA’s ability to beat estimates is no longer in question, but its ability to exceed an already-elevated set of expectations around guidance, margins, and forward visibility very much is. For the May 20 report, history suggests that unless the company can deliver a next-quarter revenue guide that again forces a meaningful upward revision to consensus, and can do so while maintaining or expanding gross margins and providing credible commentary on China and Blackwell supply, the stock may struggle to rally even on a clean beat of the April-quarter numbers.
Management Guidance
In its February 25, 2026 earnings release, NVIDIA provided fiscal first-quarter 2027 guidance that set the framework for the May 20 report: revenue of approximately $78.0 billion, plus or minus 2%, implying a range of $76.4 billion to $79.6 billion. The company also guided non-GAAP gross margin to approximately 75.0%, plus or minus 50 basis points, suggesting a range of 74.5% to 75.5%. On the surface, these figures represent another sequential step-up, but the guidance also reflects a subtle moderation in the rate of acceleration compared to prior quarters, when sequential growth rates were running closer to 20%.
One additional wrinkle in the guidance framework is the change to non-GAAP reporting that takes effect with this quarter. Beginning in fiscal Q1 2027, NVIDIA will include stock-based compensation (SBC) expense in its non-GAAP measures, a shift the company announced in its February earnings release. This change can make quarter-to-quarter and year-over-year comparisons more complex, particularly for investors who have been tracking “adjusted” EPS trends over time. Depending on the magnitude of SBC in the April quarter, the new methodology could either flatter or obscure the underlying earnings growth rate. Management will need to provide clear reconciliation and context around this change to avoid confusion, and analysts will need to ensure their models reflect the new definition to avoid apples-to-oranges comparisons with prior quarters.
If NVIDIA delivers revenue at or slightly above the consensus and gross margins in the middle of the guided range (~75%), but provides July-quarter guidance that is merely in-line with where the Street is currently positioned (likely in the $82 billion to $85 billion range based on historical sequential patterns), the stock reaction may be muted or even negative, mirroring the February 2026 dynamic where a strong beat and above-consensus guide still left shares flat because the market was looking for evidence of re-acceleration. If the company can deliver revenue above $80 billion, gross margins at or above 75.5%, and July-quarter guidance that forces another meaningful upward revision (implying revenue in the $88 billion to $90 billion range, for instance), the stock could rally sharply as it would signal that the “AI infrastructure supercycle” narrative remains intact and that NVIDIA’s competitive moat and pricing power are as strong as ever.
What to Watch
NVIDIA will almost certainly beat the consensus estimates for the fiscal first quarter 2027. The company’s four-quarter streak of beats, combined with the strength of AI infrastructure spending trends and the ramp of Blackwell production, makes a modest upside surprise on the April-quarter results highly probable. However, the more critical question (and the one that will determine the stock’s reaction) is whether NVIDIA can deliver forward guidance for the July quarter that again forces the Street to revise estimates higher and demonstrates that the current pace of growth is sustainable into the second half of calendar 2026.
The base case is that NVIDIA reports revenue in the $79 billion to $80 billion range, EPS near $1.78, and non-GAAP gross margins at or slightly above the 75% midpoint of guidance. If the company can pair these results with July-quarter revenue guidance in the $86 billion to $88 billion range and maintain gross margin guidance near 75%, the stock should trade higher. This scenario would validate the “AI infrastructure supercycle” narrative and demonstrate that NVIDIA’s competitive moat and pricing power remain intact even as the revenue base scales to unprecedented levels.
The key risk to this outlook is that the July-quarter guide comes in closer to $82 billion to $84 billion, still representing strong sequential growth, but not enough to force a meaningful upward revision to consensus or to signal re-acceleration. In this scenario, even if NVIDIA beats the April-quarter estimates, the stock could trade flat or down, mirroring the February 2026 dynamic where a strong beat and above-consensus guide still left shares unchanged because the market was looking for evidence of a steeper growth trajectory. The options market is pricing in a 6.5%-7.5% move in either direction, suggesting that anything less than a clear “beat-and-raise” that exceeds the already-elevated expectations could disappoint.
Key Metrics
1. July-Quarter Revenue Guidance (Target: $86B–$88B or higher): This is the single most important number in the entire report. If NVIDIA can guide July-quarter revenue to $86 billion or above, it would imply continued sequential growth of 10%+ and force the Street to extend higher assumptions about the sustainability of AI infrastructure spending. Anything below $84 billion would signal normalization and likely trigger a negative stock reaction, even if the April-quarter results beat estimates.
2. Non-GAAP Gross Margin (Target: 75.0%–75.5%): Gross margin is the clearest indicator of whether NVIDIA’s growth is “high quality” or whether the company is sacrificing profitability to maintain revenue momentum. A result at or above 75.5% would signal that Blackwell production is ramping efficiently, that the product mix remains favorable, and that NVIDIA retains pricing power. A result below 74.7% would raise concerns about cost pressures, competitive dynamics, or an unfavorable shift toward lower-margin products.
3. Data Center Revenue and Sequential Growth Rate (Target: $75B+, up 15%+ sequentially): Data center revenue is the core of NVIDIA’s business and the primary driver of the AI infrastructure narrative. Investors will be looking for data center revenue of at least $75 billion in the April quarter, representing sequential growth of 15% or more from the January quarter’s level. Any sign of deceleration—particularly if sequential growth falls below 10%—would be interpreted as evidence that hyperscaler spending is normalizing or that Blackwell demand is not as robust as expected. Management’s commentary on customer concentration, the mix of training versus inference workloads, and the pipeline of future deployments will provide critical context for the sustainability of data center growth.
4. China Revenue Trends and Export Restriction Impact (Target: Stable or growing sequentially): China has been a wildcard in NVIDIA’s story since the May 2025 earnings report, when the company disclosed an $8 billion revenue headwind from export restrictions. Investors will be listening for any updates on how China revenue trended in the April quarter and what assumptions are embedded in the July-quarter guide. Any indication that export restrictions are tightening further, that H20 demand is weaker than expected, or that the China revenue opportunity is structurally impaired would be a negative for the stock. Conversely, commentary suggesting that China revenue is stabilizing or that the company is finding ways to serve the market within the regulatory framework would be a positive.
5. Blackwell Supply, Demand, and Pricing Commentary (Target: Demand exceeding supply, no pricing pressure): Blackwell is the next-generation architecture that is supposed to drive NVIDIA’s growth over the next 12 to 18 months, and any commentary on supply availability, customer demand, and pricing dynamics will be closely scrutinized. Investors want to hear that Blackwell demand is exceeding supply (implying strong customer urgency and pricing power), that production is ramping smoothly without yield issues or cost overruns, and that customers are willing to pay premium prices for early access. Any hints that supply is catching up to demand, that customers are pushing out orders, or that pricing is coming under pressure would raise concerns about the durability of NVIDIA’s competitive moat and the sustainability of its margin profile.
