Sustainable investing has been challenged on many fronts over the last 12 months and we expect conditions to remain volatile in 2023. Global Head of Stewardship and Sustainable Investing, Jenn-Hui Tan, outlines why we expect firms to ‘get real’ on ESG (environmental, social and governance) in 2023 with a focus on corporate resilience, the just transition and natural capital.
- A new, more mature approach to ESG integration is emerging – one that acknowledges the necessary trade-offs between the short-term decisions required to remain in business versus the longer-term needs of customers, employees, and communities.
- The more standardised and aligned regulation is, the more effective it should be. But with a fragmenting geopolitical landscape it will become harder for cross-border alignment.
- Many areas of the transition are starting to accelerate as companies and investors increasingly realise that, whether for energy security reasons or to avoid future climate disasters, there is no turning back.
Russia’s war in Ukraine, rising inflation and dramatically higher fossil fuel prices have made some investors question the underlying values and financial performance of ESG (environmental, social and governance) investing. Indeed, the very idea of investing sustainably has come in for criticism in many parts of the world.
But the evidence of large-scale natural disasters linked to climate change won’t go away, and the energy crisis has refocussed minds on the need to think for the long term – and may even speed up investment in renewables. In many markets, regulation targeting sustainability is already coming into force or is on the horizon.
As a result of this context, we expect firms to ‘get real’ on ESG in 2023 with a focus on corporate resilience, the just transition and natural capital.
A balancing act
Volatile markets create a stark contrast between the needs of different stakeholders and the choice they face of integrating ESG for value or for values. As a result, there is some evidence that a new, more mature approach to ESG integration is emerging – one that acknowledges the necessary trade-offs between the short-term decisions required to remain in business versus the longer-term needs of customers, employees, and communities. Some companies with net-zero plans have found them harder to implement in 2022 due to higher material and energy costs and disrupted supply chains, while others have benefited from clean energy investments already made. A similar issue can arise at the government level, where many nations have had to revert to fossil fuel power generation to keep the lights on (literally) and to protect the economy, while still planning for a more secure, affordable, and sustainable energy future.
Top Australian Brokers
For asset owners (and managers), sustainable investing remains a priority because of – not despite – the current environment, given the physical and transition risks that companies face. Investors continue to support capital allocation towards the energy transition where it produces long-term positive returns and creates competitive advantage. But they too have become more focussed on the reality of reaching net zero, especially in relation to sector materiality (e.g., higher emitters could pose greater risks), scenario analysis (e.g., economic effects of climate scenarios), product suites (ways to decarbonise portfolios), public policy monitoring (sectors exposed to policy changes) and active ownership (where investors can have the biggest impact).
System-wide issues require broader engagement
At Fidelity, we have broadened the ways in which we try to influence sustainable outcomes for clients. We’ve increased our engagement with company value and supply chains on material risks to sectors, particularly biodiversity, and with policymakers on system-wide risks such as climate change and biodiversity loss that require macro stewardship.
This is particularly relevant for high emission industries such as steel and mining that are core to the transition but currently rely on capital-intensive emerging technologies to decarbonise. It is also important for sectors like coal that must be phased out in a just manner but at speed. We have now built our thermal coal transition framework and begun intensive engagement with major players. We have developed new sustainability tools, including one that measures corporate revenue generation against the metrics and targets of the Sustainable Development Goals, and extended our impact and nature product ranges.
Effective regulation and data
The more standardised and aligned regulation is, the more effective it should be. Fidelity supports global initiatives such as the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and we hope for better coordination across jurisdictions. However, we recognise that in a fragmenting geopolitical world, differences will persist, and green product labelling is likely to remain country specific.
Regulation should drive greater transparency through common frameworks and underlying data standards, increasing the amount of sustainability data available to investors. But simply having the information is not enough. What matters is how investors use and interpret this data to drive meaningful analysis of, and engagement with, companies to generate real-world outcomes.
Moreover, different sectors may require different metrics and methods of comparison to understand how quickly they can and should achieve sustainability goals. The industry should resist the temptation to reach for one-size-fits-all solutions.
The loss of biodiversity is unprecedented and there is evidence that it is accelerating, posing a serious threat to global economic prosperity and supply chains, made worse through its connection with climate change. As policy makers wake up to this systemic risk, regulatory and disclosure frameworks for natural capital, including the EU taxonomy and Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), are being developed, with more to come. So, we are extending our work to understand the real price being paid for nature loss, and how we can help our clients mitigate this risk and capture opportunities. Getting real on climate means getting real on nature too, both to mitigate and to adapt to a changing world.
Where we go from here
Despite the multiple challenges going into 2023, there are plenty of ways sustainable investing can be adapted to help solve these problems, the most obvious being faster deployment of renewables and storage to increase energy security.
Fidelity strives to support the real economy’s transition by having the right building blocks for clients, engaging with heavy emitters, and leveraging our research capability. We are prioritising several areas for 2023: ensuring a just transition as we decarbonise key sectors of the economy; addressing drivers of nature loss; and enabling the resilient growth of our investee companies.
This will help us target our efforts even more precisely – individually and collectively – alongside technological and policy development. Engaging with regulators on delivering action and transparency should also enable us to help clients manage regional differences.
The environment for ESG may remain tough in 2023, but the climate crisis is here. Many areas of the transition are starting to accelerate as companies and investors increasingly realise that, whether for energy security reasons or to avoid future potential climate disasters, there is no turning back.