If you are trying to decide between the top Australian ETFs, this is likely one of the first comparisons you will make. VAS and A200 are both low-cost, market-cap-weighted ASX funds built for long-term investors who want broad domestic equity exposure in a single trade, but there are a couple of notable differences that make things a little easier.
VAS tracks the S&P/ASX 300 Index, while A200 tracks an index of the 200 largest ASX companies. That means the choice is not just about fees, but also about how much breadth you want to be exposed to.
The VAS is the default classic option; what with it having been around longer, being larger, and with the the extra 100 stocks beyond the ASX 200. That does not radically change the character of the fund, because the Australian market is still heavily dominated by large banks and miners, but it does mean you own a little more of the market below the mega-caps, if that is what you want.
The A200 is the cost-first option, and with the largest market cap stocks dominating market performance by and large, do you really need to pay more for the extra breadth?
It is important to point out that VAS and A200 are much more alike than different, and this is not the case of choosing between good and bad products. Both are cap-weighted Australian equity ETFs concentrated in financials and resources that pay quarterly distributions. As far as income, on current figures, the yields are also close with VAS 2.88% versus A200 3.01%, which is not a big enough gap to be the deciding factor on its own. This is effectively a choice between good ETFs, where one wins on cost, and the other on diversification. So if you know which is the priority for you, and these are the two ETFs you are choosing between, this becomes a simpler choice than many.
Top Australian Brokers
- Pepperstone - Top Australian broker - Read our review
- eToro - Invest in ASX and international shares - Read our review
VAS vs A200 Compared
| ASX: VAS | ASX: A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest price | A$106.24 | A$143.27 |
| Inception date | 4 May 2009 | 7 May 2018 |
| Management fee | 0.07% p.a. | 0.04% p.a. |
| Index tracked | S&P/ASX 300 Index | Solactive Australia 200 Index |
| Fund size | A$18.39B | A$4.72B |
| Distribution frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Latest indicated yield | 2.88% | 3.01% |
| Coverage style | Top 300 ASX stocks | Top 200 ASX stocks |
Fees
This is the cleanest battleground, with the VAS charging 0.07% p.a., while A200 charges 0.04% p.a. If your philosophy is that core index exposure should be as cheap as possible, A200 is the clear winner here.
Breadth
This is where VAS hits back, as it is another clear data element. VAS tracks the S&P/ASX 300, which means broader coverage than A200’s 200-stock universe. In practice, both funds are still dominated by the same largest names, but VAS gives a bit more exposure to the mid-cap tail of Aussie markets. If you are looking for breadth, the VAS is the better option of the two.
Why Choose VAS
The bull case for VAS is that it is the more complete “own Australia” ETF. Because it tracks the S&P/ASX 300, it gives you exposure not only to the dominant large caps but also to more of the mid-cap layer beneath them. That extra breadth is not huge in portfolio-weight terms, but it does make VAS a slightly more diversified representation of the Australian listed market.
There is also a trust and scale argument. VAS is one of the most widely used Australian ETF building blocks and is much larger than A200. That matters because larger, older funds often enjoy stronger liquidity, wider recognition, and a kind of default status in portfolios and model allocations.
The downside is that you are paying more for an exposure that will usually behave very similarly to A200. The extra 0.03% p.a. is small in absolute terms, but over very long holding periods, especially in large portfolios, it is still real.
Why Choose A200
The bull case for A200 is as simple as giving you access to the top companies in Australia at a lower fee. Because the ASX is top-heavy, the 200 largest companies already capture most of the market’s performance.
The other attraction is efficiency. If you are building a long-term portfolio and expect to keep topping up over years or decades, fee drag matters. A200’s fee edge is not exciting, but it is durable. And in a low-cost indexing world, durable advantages matter.
The trade-off is that A200 is slightly less complete as a representation of the Australian market. You do miss the extra layer of ASX 201–300 stocks that VAS holds. For many investors that is negligible, but for investors who want the broadest passive local-market proxy they can get in one trade, it is still a real point in VAS’s favour.
