Since the financial crisis, the Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) interest rate cuts and large-scale asset purchases, meant to spur recovery, have helped bonds to rally. A benchmark index has returned 4% in the last decade. However, the road ahead looks bumpier for bonds, as the Fed continues to tighten monetary policy. With U.S. inflation heading towards the central bank’s 2% target and the country’s labor market dynamics strengthening, the Fed is likely to tighten monetary policy in two ways: by raising interest rates and by reducing the size of its balance sheet.
In the last three years, the Fed has raised interest rates just four times-the most gradual rate hiking cycle in history. However, with the U.S. economy continuing to motor along, we believe the pace of interest rate hikes may increase, with at least one more rate rise this year, followed by three to four in 2018. Contrary to our views, markets are pricing in just two more 0.25% rate hikes by June 2019. This would suggest investors are not yet fully braced for a faster-moving Fed in the next two years.
Shrinking the balance sheet
One important point is that the terminal fed funds rate (or target level of interest rates in the hiking cycle) is expected to be much lower than in the past. The Fed forecasts long-term rates of 3%-below the historical average of 5.3%. That would leave the Fed with less ammunition to fight the next recession and may require it to lean on alternative monetary policy tools.
One such alternative tool is shrinking the balance sheet and, now, after the first rate hikes, the Fed is actively discussing it. Since raising interest rates has been the Fed’s tool of choice for tightening monetary policy, investors and Fed officials can gauge its impact on the economy, investors, however, are not as accustomed to balance sheet reduction.
Exhibit 1 depicts the Fed balance sheet’s expansion since 2002 with quantitative easing (QE) bringing it to $4.5 trillion currently, with $2.5 trillion held in U.S. Treasuries and another $1.8 trillion held in mortgagebacked securities (MBS). The Fed has been maintaining these levels by reinvesting principal repayments and rolling over or replacing maturing securities.
The balance sheet journey: When, where and how long?
We think of the Fed’s balance sheet reduction as a journey. Before embarking, we consider three questions: When will it begin? Where is the final destination? How long will it take?
Fed officials commented at their June meeting that it would likely be appropriate “this year” to change its bond reinvestment program. This has led investors to believe that the Fed will begin reducing its balance sheet in late 2017. We have received fewer clues about what level the balance sheet will be reduced to. Looking at Exhibit 1, a natural assumption might be that the goal is to reduce the balance sheet to its preQE level of about $1 trillion. However, considering the increase in currency in circulation-combined with changes in capital requirements for banks-it seems likely the Fed will look to reduce the balance sheet to a significantly higher level, $2.5 trillion.2
The most pressing question for investors may be how long this balance sheet journey might take. In the June meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee announced that it would begin reducing the balance sheet at a rate of $10 billion per month. Going forward, the Fed will look to increase the rate of decline, by $10 billion per quarter until it reaches a rate of $50 billion. At its peak the Fed could be reducing the size of the balance sheet by $600 billion per year. However, without any details on the final destination of the balance sheet it is difficult to assess how long this journey will take. 

Effects of an unprecedented reduction

What effect will reducing the balance sheet have on fixed income markets? Reducing a balance sheet of this size is unprecedented. The Fed owns 13% of U.S. government debt and 33% of the U.S. MBS market. With this in mind, it is likely that balance sheet reduction will push up bond yields as the Fed goes from being a net buyer to a net seller of fixed income.
A complicating factor is that tighter monetary policy is expected to come at a time when duration within U.S. fixed income is at multi-decade highs (Exhibit 2). Long duration means bond benchmarks are highly sensitive to changes in interest rates. This is a consequence of low bond yields and both corporations and governments borrowing at longer maturities to lock in historically low rates. 

What can investors do about these challenges?
Fixed income investors need not be helpless in the face of tighter monetary policy. Not all fixed income sectors respond the same way to a rising rate environment. Three key actions are likely to help fixed income portfolios: understand and manage duration, diversify across fixed income sectors and invest internationally. 
How do various fixed income sectors hold up when rates rise? Exhibit 3 highlights the price and total return performance of different fixed income sectors when rates rise by 1%.
1. Understand and manage duration
Long-dated U.S. Treasury bonds tend to decline most sharply when rates rise, shorter-dated Treasuries less so. However, long-term investors do benefit from reinvesting at higher yields as rates rise

2. Diversify across fixed income sectors
Outside the Treasury market, some higher risk sectors are likely to hold up well during a rate hikingenvironment. Our model suggests investors see a 4% price decline when rates rise by 1%, but the large coupons on offer in U.S. high yield, allow investors, on a total return basis, to offset these price declines.
3. Look to invest internationally
Although economic growth in the rest of the world is improving, it is likely that monetary policy divergence between the U.S. and other countries will continue for the time being. This means that diversifying internationally can help shield an investor’s portfolio from tighter U.S. monetary policy.
Many international fixed-income benchmark indices have a low, or even negative, correlation with movements in U.S. rates. Furthermore, U.S. investors historically have had little international exposure in their fixed income allocation. The U.S. debt market makes up 33% of global debt, yet U.S. investors’ fixed income portfolios have a 92% allocation to U.S. debt markets.3 A bias toward domestic fixed income within a portfolio makes sense-investing internationally comes with either currency risks or hedging costs. However, with the relatively low cost of hedging today and the diversification benefits of international fixed income, investors may want to think about increasing their global exposure. (Exhibit 4)
Why hold fixed income at all?
Considering the challenging outlook, it is understandable if investors question whether they should hold any fixed income at all. Even with a challenging outlook, fixed income still has an important part to play in investors’ portfolios.
For long-term investors, including fixed income within a portfolio makes for a much smoother passage to their end goal- and that matters, as well. Exhibit 5 illustrates the flatter movement of a 40/60 stock-bond 

 portfolio compared to the more volatile S&P 500 and a 60/40 stock-bond portfolio. The S&P 500 has fallenfar more than either of the two diversified portfolios and more importantly, has taken two or more years longer to recover its original value.
Fixed income’s benefit historically can be seen during the last 20 years, when the S&P 500 had a negativemonth: while equities historically fell 3.6% on average those months, the benchmark U.S. bond index on average rallied 0.5%.
Another reason to stay invested in fixed income is that it can provide downside protection if economic growth falters and a recession occurs sooner rather than later. In an environment in which risk assets may underperform, investors may turn back to the historical safety of core fixed income.
Although a recession in the short term is not our base case, no one can know with certainty. The AnxiousIndex survey, which asks economists to predict a decline in real GDP in the following quarter, indicates that while economists may not be worried about a recession today, the profession’s track record of predicting them is pretty poor. 

Typically, economists don’t start predicting declines in growth until the middle of a recession. (Exhibit 6) Staying diversified can help protect investors against unforeseen changes in the economic landscape.

Investment implications
• With economic data improving, the Fed is gradually raising interest rates. This rate hiking cycle is likely to continue, and we are also likely to see the Fed begin to reduce the size of its balance sheet, further tightening monetary policy.
• A tighter monetary policy outlook is likely to be a headwind for fixed income investors going forward. However, managing duration, diversifying into other fixed income sectors and looking internationally may help an investor weather this tighter monetary policy environment.
• It is understandable for investors to be questioning the benefits of holding fixed income in their portfolios considering the challenging outlook for the asset class. However, fixed income helps diversify a portfolio and reduce volatility by protecting on the downside.

>> BACK TO THE NEWSLETTER: Click here to read other articles from this week’s newsletter

Originally published by J.P.Morgan

The Market Insights program provides comprehensive data and commentary on global markets without reference to products. Designed as a tool to help clients understand the markets and support investment decision making, the program explores the implications of current economic data and changing market conditions.

This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own professional advisers, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be suitable to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields is not a reliable indicator of current and future results.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. This communication is issued by the following entities: in the United Kingdom by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in other EEA jurisdictions by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l.; in Hong Kong by JF Asset Management Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited; in Singapore by JPMorgan Asset Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No. 197601586K), or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Co. Reg. No. 201120355E); in Taiwan by JPMorgan Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited; in Japan by JPMorgan Asset Management (Japan) Limited which is a member of the Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association and the Japan Securities Dealers Association and is regulated by the Financial Services Agency (registration number “Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 330”); in Korea by JPMorgan Asset Management (Korea) Company Limited; in Australia to wholesale clients only as defined in section 761A and 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 55143832080) (AFSL 376919); in Brazil by Banco J.P. Morgan S.A.; in Canada for institutional clients’ use only by JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., and in the United States by

JPMorgan Distribution Services Inc. and J.P. Morgan Institutional Investments, Inc., both members of FINRA/SIPC.; and J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.

In APAC, distribution is for Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan and Singapore. For all other countries in APAC, to intended recipients only.

Copyright 2017 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.